Who are you? It’s a seemingly basic question, but 1 that the safety neighborhood struggles with daily. It is a dilemma when we don’t know who we are simply because if we don’t know who we are then we can not accurately communicate who we are simply because when decision makers don’t know who we are, and what our precise role is, they make bad decisions. When leaders make negative choices about security it increases danger and it kills folks.
The safety zealot is an idealist, and although that term is a compliment in a lot of contexts, in the context of security it is not. Safety zealots are inflexible, rigid creatures who see anyone that disagrees as evil and hazardous. Safety zealots are frequently at odds with company leaders due to the fact the leaders know view the zealots as harmless fools at ideal and lunatics at very best. The zealot desires it all and will stop at nothing at all to get it. Zealots are harmful since they are unreasonable—they are uncompromising and something significantly less than perfect is a failure. They tend to see other people as uncaring or at least not caring adequate.
The safety crusader believes that the security of workers is his or her job 24-7 and that this responsibility extends beyond the workforce and intrudes into the personal lives of the workers, security at home, security in the hobbies and pass occasions of the workers. The crusader sees him/herself as the one particular correct champion of the worker and believes that generating the work force safe is the role of every safety practitioner. Crusaders believes the only reason to make the operate spot safer is simply because it is the “right issue to do”, and to speak about safety in terms of expense savings is crass and cold-hearted.
The safety philosopher likes to argue about things that at a sensible level actually don’t make much of a distinction in actual improvement in safety. Safety philosophers will argue vehemently one particular inconsequential point against one more. Safety philosophers tend to spend hours on the internet shouting down anyone who disagrees with their selected beliefs set.
The pragmatist knows that safety is not cut and dry and that if safety is the absence of injuries you can never ever really measure it. The pragmatist may possibly face battle soon after battle with leaders who have been swayed by 1 of the other sorts of security practitioners. The safety pragmatist understands that zero injuries may possibly be feasible, but attaining it and sustaining it generally is not sensible. The pragmatist understands that his or her job is to decrease danger, and defend both worker and the company. We need more security pragmatists.
Safety accountants are enamored by numbers. They make pretty charts of body counts and enjoy to show off how a lot items have enhanced (or are improving) without truly calculating all the charges. The accountants are very good at manipulating numbers to make it look like they are doing a better job than they are.
The Safety Cop
Safety cops believe that if everyone would just comply with the security guidelines that everything would be fantastic. Security cops reside in a globe of rules, infractions, and ruthless disciplinary action for noncompliance. These safety practitioners are typically frustrated since operations do not via the book at men and women who do not comply with the guidelines. Safety cops also tend to see the injured workers as careless or reckless dopes with no the sense God gave geese. They see workers as the enemy or as youngsters that have to be watched and disciplined continually.
The Security Storm Trooper
The Security Storm Trooper sees him/herself as the thin red line among the lying workers who fake injuries so they can lie around and fraudulently gather disability. When a worker is injured on a Monday, the Security Storm Trooper defaults to the belief that the injury actually occurred although the worker was roofing his brother-in-laws residence. Security Storm Trooper operates tirelessly to stop workers from collecting funds from the organization.
So Which One particular Are You?
If you are becoming genuinely sincere you probably are seeing yourself in a single or a lot more of these roles. I think we all locate ourselves playing one or more of these roles once in a although, the danger becomes when we begin playing one particular role to the exclusion of all others.
If you are interested in reading more of my work check out my articles in Entrepreneur magazine https://www.entrepreneur.com/author/phil-la-duke You can support me out a lot by sharing these articles from inside the post.